|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
||||||
|
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||||
Nature Conservancy President Steve McCormick Responds to Recent Article in World Watch MagazineWorld Watch’s recent article by Mac Chapin, “A Challenge to Conservationists,” raises important issues regarding the fundamental need to involve indigenous people and traditional communities in conservation efforts. An open dialogue is critical to strengthening the collaboration among indigenous communities and conservationists. For more than 50 years, The Nature Conservancy has depended upon partnerships with local peoples to conserve some of the most biologically critical and threatened ecosystems on Earth. Most of the world’s biodiversity exists in areas inhabited by people. The Nature Conservancy knows that effective conservation cannot be achieved unless the people who live and rely on those lands are an integral part of the process. Among The Nature Conservancy’s core values is a “Commitment to People,” which states that we “respect the needs of local communities by developing ways to conserve biological diversity while at the same time enabling humans to live productively and sustainably on the landscape.” The Nature Conservancy works in all 50 of the United States, as well as in 28 countries around the world. In more than 30 of those programs – nationally and internationally – the Conservancy is working with indigenous communities to help protect their traditional lands. From Colombia where we have helped indigenous tribes reacquire their sacred lands, to Alaska where we are working with Native Alaskans to incorporate traditional knowledge and subsistence activities into conservation plans, Conservancy employees strive to embody that value in everything they do. Mr. Chapin’s underlying premise – that large international conservation groups are by their very nature incapable of effectively working with indigenous and traditional peoples – is simply incorrect. Such a premise suggests that any organization working in disparate locations around the world and receiving significant individual, governmental or corporate support should not even attempt to work in areas with indigenous populations for fear of imposing foreign priorities and irreparably harming traditional lifestyles. On the contrary, organizations of every size should use their resources to reach out to all segments of the world to form partnerships to conserve critical ecosystems. Mr. Chapin states that “indigenous peoples and conservationists have very different agendas.” The reality is that indigenous people and conservationists struggle against many of the same challenges – from expanding global trade and epidemics to the effects of climate change and irresponsible corporate activities. Only through working collaboratively can these challenges be confronted. Just as indigenous communities have unique knowledge of their land that is essential to conserving biodiversity, organizations such as the Conservancy have scientific and financial resources that are needed in today’s global society to help conserve wildlife and local ways of life. Mr. Chapin suggests that as conservation groups increasingly rely on science, they grow increasingly dismissive of indigenous populations. But science and social responsibility can – and must – go hand in hand. Science helps The Nature Conservancy determine where we work to protect critical habitat, but science does not confine us in how we work to conserve those lands. Each community is unique. Our tools, such as participatory conservation, enable us to listen to community concerns and develop joint solutions that have scientific credibility. We build long-term relationships with communities, continually refine our plans and jointly assess our activities. But we recognize that more must be done. The Conservancy in recent years has expanded our staff and investment in international programs to address local issues more effectively. We have established networking groups to allow our staff collaborating with international communities to share strategies and lessons learned. The Conservancy also encouraged the creation of a year-long Global Partnership Dialogue to be launched at the 2004 World Conservation Congress in Bangkok to bring together indigenous, local and NGO leaders from around the world to discuss how to improve partnerships with conservation groups. And the Conservancy’s philosophy of adaptive management drives us to continuously review our activities. Regular conservation audits evaluate the effectiveness of partnerships with communities and other stakeholders. Learning the unique cultural complexities of indigenous groups is a continuous process. Just as learning the complexities and methods of conservation is an evolving science. But neither science nor community involvement can be ignored, and both are essential tools in achieving the common goal of conservationists and indigenous populations: preserving the Earth’s natural resources and ecosystems that will sustain our children, grandchildren and beyond. To learn more about The Nature Conservancy’s work with indigenous and traditional communities, visit nature.org/indigenous/ ### Learn more online about The Nature Conservancy and Indigenous People:
|
